John Frederick Walker

Houston Museum of Natural Science guest blogpost

Posted in ivory news by JFW on February 2, 2009

I was also invited to contribute a blogpost to the Houston Museum of Natural Science’s “Beyond Bones” blog before my lecture there:

The Writing of Ivory’s Ghosts: The White Gold of History and the Fate of Elephants

As I prepare for a national lecture tour based on my forthcoming book, Ivory’s Ghosts, I know there’ll be one question I’ll get everywhere I go, including the HMNS on January 20: “why did you decide to write this book?”

In my case, the germ of the idea began with the realization that despite the nearly twenty-year-old ban on international trade in ivory, elephants are still being poached for their tusks. As a journalist and a conservationist, that bothered me. I began to wonder about the connection between the demand for ivory in history and its impact on the animal that has always been its greatest source. Was there something about this troubling, long-standing link that would throw light on the problems of elephant conservation in the 21st century?

Five years ago, I started researching Ivory’s Ghosts in museums and archives in the US and Europe, and then traveled to Africa to investigate elephant issues first hand, interviewing experts from South Africa to Kenya. I learned that ivory has been valued since the Ice Age, when humans carved figurines from the tusks of the woolly mammoth, the ancestor of the modern elephant—35,000 years ago! Even then humans were attracted to ivory’s beauty and scarcity, and its ability to be finely carved.

Throughout history, nearly every culture, from ancient Egypt to the US, used it to make small sculptures, furniture, combs, chessmen, and hundreds of other objects, a list that later included pistol grips, piano keys and billiard balls. By the late 1800s, ivory was the plastic of its age. Demand helped drive the slaughter of elephants, whose tusks were brought to the African coasts on the shoulders of slaves. By the 1980s, organized poaching, often carried out with AK-47s, halved the African elephant population, causing world-wide outrage that led to an international agreement (under CITES, the convention on trade in endangered species) banning cross-border trade in ivory.

But the ivory ban has failed to stop poaching. In Ivory’s Ghosts, I look into the reasons behind that. One is that the long-standing demand for ivory is not likely to disappear, at least anytime soon. The attraction to ivory is simply too ingrained in too many cultures. And poaching, not surprisingly, flourishes in countries that lack adequate enforcement, or are torn apart by war, like the Democratic Republic of Congo. In the absence of a legal market to meet age-old demand, the black market for ivory is flourishing.

Now some conservationists are starting to think what was previously unthinkable: returning to a highly controlled ivory trade, one that’s structured to help, not hurt elephants. After all, as long as there are elephants, there will be ivory.

Today, tusks are routinely recovered from elephants that die of natural causes, and stockpiled in the warehouses of wildlife departments and park services in dozens of African countries. What should be done with all this valuable “white gold?” Cash-strapped African nations are not about to destroy it. Instead, they have twice successfully petitioned CITES to be allowed to sell their legitimate ivory caches to raise funds strictly for elephant conservation. The last time was this past October, when Namibia, Botswana, Zimbabwe and South Africa sold over 100 tons of tusks, raising $15 million from CITES-approved buyers (Japan and China), who agreed not to re-export any ivory products.

The reason these countries gained approval for this sale was that they have well-managed elephant populations, and control poaching. In fact, Botswana and South Africa actually have too many elephants for the habitat available to them. Officials in South Africa’s Kruger National Park may even have to resort to culling some of their elephants if they can’t find other ways to keep their fast-growing herds within bounds.

It’s a situation that strikes many elephant lovers as contradictory—it gave me pause at first—but regular, highly controlled, CITES-administered sales might provide a means to support successful elephant conservation, strange as that sounds.

I look forward to sharing what I’ve learned about the fascinating, complex, and often troubling subject of ivory and elephants with the HMNS audience, and hearing their thoughts on the future of elephants.”

One Response

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Erin said, on February 3, 2009 at 7:47 pm

    Hi John! Thanks for the link back to BEYONDbones – and the fascinating post!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: